<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MattOehrlein.com &#187; metric system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattoehrlein.com/tag/metric-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattoehrlein.com</link>
	<description>I hope this is embarrassing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>American Wire Gauge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattoehrlein.com/2009/08/american-wire-gauge/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mattoehrlein.com/2009/08/american-wire-gauge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattoehrlein.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The English measurement system sucks so bad. The most annoying nuisance of the system is, by far, wire gauges. For example: A big wire is, say, .5 AWG (american wire gauge) whereas a small wire is maybe 36 AWG. Does &#8230; <a href="http://blog.mattoehrlein.com/2009/08/american-wire-gauge/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English measurement system sucks so bad.</p>
<p>The most annoying nuisance of the system is, by far, wire gauges. For example: A big wire is, say, .5 AWG (american wire gauge) whereas a small wire is maybe 36 AWG. Does it seem completely ridiculous to anyone else that thicker wires have <em>smaller</em> numbers? Yes? good. Now lets say I want to go REALLY big. Like, you know, bigger than zero&#8230; guess what bigger than 0 is. Nope, wrong. It&#8217;s 00. Going bigger than 00 is 000, then 0000 (see where this madness is going?). To make things <em>easier</em>, you write 00 as 2/0,  000 as 3/0, etc. and pronounce these as &#8220;two aught&#8221;, &#8220;three aught&#8221;, etc. After 4/0 it switches completely to a <span style="text-decoration: underline;">different system</span>. Yeah. You heard me.</p>
<p><span id="more-205"></span></p>
<p>From Wikipedia: (shut up, it&#8217;s a valid source)</p>
<blockquote><p>In the North American electrical industry, conductors larger than 4/0 AWG are generally identified by the area in thousands of circular mils (<strong>kcmil</strong>), where 1 kcmil = 0.5067 mm². A <em>circular mil</em> is the area of a wire one mil in diameter. One million circular mils is the area of a cylinder with 1000 mil = 1 inch diameter. An older abbreviation for one thousand circular mils is <em>MCM</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, gosh.</p>
<p>Wait. Lets say I need a very specific diameter of wire. If I&#8217;m a brilliant American, I&#8217;d just go to my handy equation for AWG using diameter&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_215" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 492px"><a href="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/a4a6e74e48825a2d5de74baf1aa4ada8.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-215" title="AWG-diameter-equation" src="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/a4a6e74e48825a2d5de74baf1aa4ada8.png" alt="Simple!" width="482" height="39" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Simple!</p></div>
<p>.. wait.. what? Log base 92. Are you kidding me? Who the hell thought this crap up? Someone had better have lost their job over this.</p>
<p>However, If I go to the magical land of Metric, I&#8217;m sure they have a similar system&#8230; I mean.. it doesn&#8217;t get much more simple than AWG. There really can&#8217;t be that much room for improvement. Logarithms just seem so&#8230;. intuitive..</p>
<div id="attachment_207" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 277px"><a href="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/metric.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-207" title="metricband" src="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/metric.jpg" alt="The Metric System" width="267" height="232" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Metric System</p></div>
<p>In metric-land, the gauge of wire is just given in cross sectional area (mm²). You know, so you could say things like &#8220;I need a 1 mm² wire&#8221;. Wow! simple! You could even use an equation you learned how to do in grade school, A = πr², to figure out this humdinger.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the catch? You have to be a terrorist, or look like this guy to use it.</p>
<div id="attachment_208" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 274px"><a href="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/plotting-mime.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-208" title="plotting-mime" src="http://mattoehrlein.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/plotting-mime.jpg" alt="Metric System User" width="264" height="384" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Metric System User</p></div>
<p>Can we please just switch already? Who&#8217;s on board with me?</p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/Users/Matt/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mattoehrlein.com/2009/08/american-wire-gauge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

